The decision to perform a caesarean delivery, whether elective or emergency, necessitates careful consideration of anaesthetic management to ensure the safety and well-being of both mother and neonate. Anaesthesia for caesarean delivery is a critical component of obstetric care, aiming to provide painless surgical access while minimizing risks associated with maternal physiological changes during pregnancy and the surgical procedure itself.
Physiological Changes in Pregnancy Relevant to Anaesthesia
Pregnancy brings about profound physiological alterations that significantly impact anaesthetic management. Understanding these changes is paramount for anticipating and mitigating potential complications.
- Cardiovascular System: There is a 30-50% increase in cardiac output, with a shift in distribution favouring the uterus. Plasma volume expands by 40-50%, leading to a physiological dilutional anaemia. Intravascular volume is higher, but the supine position can cause aortocaval compression, reducing venous return and leading to supine hypotensive syndrome, characterized by hypotension, bradycardia, and reduced uterine blood flow. This compression is exacerbated by the gravid uterus and can occur as early as 16 weeks gestation.
- Respiratory System: Tidal volume increases, but the vital capacity remains relatively unchanged. The respiratory rate may slightly increase, leading to an increased minute ventilation. However, the expiratory reserve volume decreases, and the functional residual capacity (FRC) is reduced by up to 20% due to the elevated diaphragm. This diminished FRC, coupled with increased oxygen consumption, makes pregnant women more susceptible to rapid desaturation during apnoea. Laryngeal oedema can also make airway management more challenging.
- Gastrointestinal System: Gastric emptying is significantly delayed, and lower oesophageal sphincter tone is reduced due to hormonal influences and mechanical pressure from the uterus. This increases the risk of aspiration of gastric contents, a leading cause of anaesthetic-related maternal mortality.
- Nervous System: The sensitivity of the central nervous system to local anaesthetics is increased during pregnancy, meaning lower doses are required to achieve the same block height. Opioid requirements may also be reduced.
- Haematological System: There is a hypercoagulable state during pregnancy, increasing the risk of thromboembolic events. Conversely, there may be a slight decrease in platelet count, although usually not clinically significant.
- Renal System: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal blood flow increase, leading to enhanced clearance of drugs.
Anaesthetic Techniques for Caesarean Delivery
The primary goal of anaesthesia for caesarean delivery is to provide adequate analgesia and surgical conditions while ensuring maternal and neonatal safety. The two main categories of anaesthesia employed are regional anaesthesia and general anaesthesia, with regional techniques being the preferred choice in most situations.
1. Regional Anaesthesia:
Regional anaesthesia involves the administration of local anaesthetic and/or opioid drugs to block nerve conduction in a specific region of the body, providing sensory and motor blockade without loss of consciousness. It is the gold standard for caesarean delivery due to its numerous advantages.
- Spinal Anaesthesia:
- Procedure: A single injection of local anaesthetic is made into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the subarachnoid space, typically in the lumbar region (L2-L5 interspace), using a fine-gauge needle.
- Onset and Duration: Onset is rapid (within minutes), providing excellent surgical anaesthesia. The duration can be extended by adding opioids or adrenaline to the local anaesthetic solution.
- Advantages:
- Rapid onset and dense sensory and motor blockade.
- Excellent surgical conditions with minimal blood loss.
- Lower incidence of neonatal depression compared to general anaesthesia.
- Reduced risk of aspiration.
- Lower incidence of postoperative pain.
- Can be easily supplemented if needed.
- Disadvantages:
- Risk of hypotension (vasodilation due to sympathetic blockade).
- Potential for post-dural puncture headache (PDPH).
- Nausea and vomiting.
- Pruritus (itching), particularly with intrathecal opioids.
- Urinary retention.
- Pharmacology: Commonly used local anaesthetics include bupivacaine, lidocaine, and ropivacaine. Hyperbaric solutions (with glucose) tend to settle in dependent areas, while hypobaric solutions (less dense than CSF) and isobaric solutions (same density) spread differently. Intrathecal opioids like fentanyl and morphine provide potent intra- and postoperative analgesia.
- Management of Hypotension: This is a critical consideration. Prevention strategies include aggressive preloading with crystalloids (though evidence is debated and can lead to pulmonary oedema in some), left uterine displacement (LUD) to prevent aortocaval compression, and prompt administration of vasopressors, typically ephedrine or phenylephrine. Phenylephrine is increasingly favoured due to its predictable alpha-adrenergic effects and less frequent reflex tachycardia.
- Contraindications: Parental refusal, local infection at the injection site, maternal sepsis, significant coagulopathy, severe aortic stenosis or hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), and increased intracranial pressure.
- Epidural Anaesthesia:
- Procedure: A catheter is inserted into the epidural space, allowing for continuous infusion or intermittent boluses of local anaesthetic and/or opioids. This provides a gradual and titratable block.
- Onset and Duration: Onset is slower than spinal anaesthesia (5-15 minutes for therapeutic levels). The block can be maintained for prolonged periods.
- Advantages:
- Provides excellent analgesia for labour and can be easily converted for caesarean delivery.
- Titratable block, allowing for precise control of sensory and motor blockade.
- Less risk of profound hypotension compared to spinal anaesthesia, as the sympathetic blockade is often less dense and slower to develop.
- Easier to manage and rescue from if complications arise.
- Lower incidence of PDPH.
- Disadvantages:
- Slower onset, which can be problematic in emergency situations.
- Potential for patchy or inadequate blockade.
- Risk of epidural catheter migration or kinking.
- Nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention (similar to spinal).
- Epidural venous plexus engorgement can lead to significant blood loss during insertion.
- Pharmacology: Similar local anaesthetics and opioids to spinal anaesthesia are used. Lower concentrations of local anaesthetics are typically used for epidural infusions compared to spinal boluses.
- Conversion to Epidural Anaesthesia for Caesarean: If labour analgesia is already established via epidural, the anaesthetist will typically administer a bolus dose of local anaesthetic through the epidural catheter to deepen the block for surgery. This requires ensuring adequate sensory level (typically T4-T6 dermatome) and motor blockade.
- Combined Spinal-Epidural (CSE) Anaesthesia:
- Procedure: This technique combines the rapid onset of spinal anaesthesia with the flexibility of epidural anaesthesia. A spinal needle is passed through an epidural needle, a spinal injection is given, and then an epidural catheter is threaded through the epidural needle.
- Advantages:
- Combines the rapid onset of spinal anaesthesia for immediate surgical pain relief with the ability to maintain and titrate analgesia with the epidural catheter.
- Allows for lower doses of intrathecal medication, potentially reducing side effects.
- Provides excellent intraoperative and postoperative pain management.
- Disadvantages:
- Higher risk of PDPH compared to spinal alone, though lower than epidural alone.
- Increased complexity of insertion.
- Potential for spinal anaesthetic to migrate up the epidural space, causing an unintended high spinal block.
2. General Anaesthesia:
General anaesthesia involves inducing a state of unconsciousness and amnesia using intravenous and/or inhaled anaesthetic agents. While regional anaesthesia is preferred, general anaesthesia may be necessary in certain situations.
- Indications for General Anaesthesia:
- Emergency caesarean delivery where rapid onset of anaesthesia is critical and regional techniques are contraindicated or impractical (e.g., patient refusal, maternal refusal of spinal/epidural, failed spinal/epidural, severe coagulopathy preventing regional, maternal collapse, maternal refusal to cooperate with positioning for regional block).
- Contraindications to regional anaesthesia.
- Severe fetal distress with maternal shock.
- Maternal refusal of regional anaesthesia.
- Induction: Typically involves rapid sequence induction (RSI) to minimize the risk of aspiration. This includes pre-oxygenation, application of cricoid pressure (Sellick’s manoeuvre) to occlude the oesophagus, and rapid intravenous administration of a hypnotic agent (e.g., propofol, thiopental) followed by a muscle relaxant (e.g., succinylcholine) to facilitate tracheal intubation.
- Maintenance: Maintained with volatile anaesthetic agents (e.g., sevoflurane, isoflurane) and/or intravenous infusions of opioids and muscle relaxants. Nitrous oxide may be used cautiously due to its potential to cause neonatal depression and bowel distension.
- Emergence: The anaesthetic is reversed, and the patient is extubated once they are awake, breathing spontaneously, and have protective airway reflexes.
- Advantages:
- Rapid onset, providing immediate unconsciousness and surgical conditions.
- Less susceptible to maternal haemodynamic instability compared to regional anaesthesia.
- Ensures amnesia for the procedure.
- Disadvantages:
- Higher risk of maternal mortality and morbidity, particularly aspiration.
- Potential for neonatal depression due to anaesthetic agents crossing the placenta.
- Difficult airway management can be a significant challenge.
- Delayed recovery compared to regional anaesthesia.
- Postoperative pain management can be more complex.
Decision-Making Process for Anaesthetic Choice
The selection of the most appropriate anaesthetic technique is a collaborative decision involving the anaesthetist, obstetrician, and the patient. Several factors are taken into account:
- Urgency of the Delivery:
- Elective Caesarean: Regional anaesthesia (spinal or epidural) is almost always the preferred choice.
- Urgent/Emergency Caesarean: Spinal anaesthesia is rapidly administered and ideal if no contraindications exist. If spinal is not feasible or if a longer duration of analgesia beyond spinal blockade is anticipated, epidural can be used (if an epidural catheter is already in situ for labour analgesia). General anaesthesia is reserved for scenarios where immediate anaesthesia is life-saving and regional techniques are not possible or too slow.
- Maternal Medical History and Comorbidities:
- Coagulation Disorders: Severe coagulopathy is a contraindication to regional anaesthesia due to the risk of spinal or epidural haematoma.
- Neurological Disorders: Pre-existing neurological conditions may influence the choice, with caution regarding potential exacerbation or diagnostic confusion.
- Cardiovascular Disease: Severe valvular heart disease or cardiomyopathy may necessitate general anaesthesia to avoid the haemodynamic fluctuations associated with regional blockade.
- Respiratory Disease: Severe restrictive lung disease may increase the risk associated with airway manipulation in general anaesthesia.
- Obesity: Morbid obesity can make airway management more challenging and may increase the difficulty of performing a successful regional block.
- Patient Preferences and Consent:
- Informed consent is crucial. Patients have the right to understand the risks and benefits of each anaesthetic technique and to express their preferences. However, in emergency situations where the patient is unable to consent, the anaesthetist and obstetrician will act in the best interest of the mother and fetus.
- Previous Anaesthetic Experiences:
- A history of difficult intubation or adverse reactions to anaesthetics will influence the choice.
- Availability of Resources and Expertise:
- The anaesthetist’s experience and the availability of necessary equipment and drugs will also play a role.
Potential Complications and Management
Regardless of the anaesthetic chosen, several potential complications can arise. Prompt recognition and management are essential.
- Hypotension: Most common with regional anaesthesia. Management involves LUD, fluid administration, and vasopressors.
- Nausea and Vomiting: Can occur with both regional and general anaesthesia. Antiemetics (e.g., ondansetron, metoclopramide) are effective.
- Pruritus: Common with intrathecal opioids. Can be treated with naloxone infusion or specific antihistamines like nalbuphine.
- Post-Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH): More common with spinal anaesthesia. Management includes hydration, analgesics, and, if persistent, an epidural blood patch.
- Nerve Injury: Rare but serious complication of regional anaesthesia.
- Spinal/Epidural Haematoma: Rare but serious complication of regional anaesthesia, necessitating urgent surgical decompression.
- Failed or Inadequate Block: May require conversion to a different anaesthetic technique.
- Aspiration: A risk with general anaesthesia but can occur with regional anaesthesia if sedated. Management involves immediate suction and supportive care.
- Difficult Airway: A significant concern with general anaesthesia, requiring advanced airway management techniques.
Postoperative Analgesia
Following caesarean delivery, effective postoperative pain management is crucial for maternal recovery and well-being. Regional techniques often provide excellent initial pain relief, which can be extended for several hours. For ongoing analgesia, oral or intravenous analgesics (e.g., paracetamol, NSAIDs, opioids) are prescribed. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with opioids is also an option for severe pain.
Conclusion
Anaesthesia for caesarean delivery is a complex and dynamic field that requires a thorough understanding of maternal physiology, anaesthetic techniques, and potential complications. Regional anaesthesia, particularly spinal anaesthesia, remains the preferred method due to its favourable maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, general anaesthesia has a vital role in select emergency situations. A careful, individualized approach to anaesthetic management, guided by the urgency of the delivery, maternal health, and patient preferences, is paramount to ensuring a safe and positive experience for both mother and baby during this significant life event. Continuous evaluation and adaptation of anaesthetic strategies based on emerging evidence and technological advancements further enhance the safety and efficacy of caesarean delivery anaesthesia.
References
- Bampoe, J., et al. (2021). Regional anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (1).
- Capogna, G., et al. (2018). Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 31(3), 267-271.
- Dyer, R. A., et al. (2019). Guidelines for the management of the acutely ill obstetric patient. South African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 25(2), 47-57.
- Haines, L., & Wallace, E. M. (2020). Anaesthesia for caesarean section. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 67, 90-100.
- Kopriva, E. L., et al. (2019). Epidural analgesia for labour and caesarean section: a review of current practice. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 31(6), 549-556.
- McDonnell, N. J. (2019). Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine, 20(9), 493-498.
- Norris, M. C. (2020). Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 33(3), 331-336.
- Pester, J., & O’Sullivan, G. (2021). Anaesthesia for caesarean section. Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine, 31(10), 281-287.
- Siu, L. L., & Bishton, G. M. (2018). General anaesthesia for caesarean section. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine, 19(10), 589-593.
- Turk, N. (2020). General anaesthesia for caesarean section. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 33(3), 337-341.
